Safety & Security · Software component
Parameter Provenance Validator
Software componentSafety & SecuritySafety, Security & Governancearc:ParameterProvenanceValidator
A pre-execution validation gate that traces each tool parameter value to a legitimate source (user input, authenticated session, retrieved context or prior tool output) and blocks untraceable or low-confidence values.
Responsibility. Blocks hallucinated tool parameter values that cannot be traced to trusted sources.
Also known as: Semantic Parameter Validator, Grounding checks, Parameter hallucination detection, Reliability alignment
Relationships
is invoked by dependency
reads dependency
- Conversation State Store abstract Ch3.7 Ch3.8
- Working Memory Buffer abstract Ch3.7
emits telemetry to dynamic
escalates to dynamic
guards control
Design guidance
- MUST NOT accept security-critical parameters (user IDs, tokens, account numbers) from external input without validation against authenticated session context.
- SHOULD block or request confirmation for parameters with unknown source before critical actions.
- MUST flag parameter values not grounded in evidence for additional verification or user clarification before execution.
- SHOULD require high-stakes values (e.g., shipping addresses) to be explicitly extracted from customer data or confirmed via explicit tool calls, not inferred.
Quantitative guidance
As stated by the sources; verify before use.
- Layered static, semantic, security and grounding validation catches 85-95% of parameter errors before execution (Ch3.8).
- Without grounding checks agents fabricate parameters in 15-30% of tool invocations depending on task complexity; grounding verification reduces this to 2-5% (research cited in Ch3.7).
Classification
- Patterns
- Parameter provenance trackingConfidence-gated confirmation for inferred valuesReliability alignment (verify parameters are grounded in context)Semantic validation
- Quality attributes
- Functional suitability: correctness and validity (ISO/IEC 25010 | NIST AI RMF: valid)Safety (ISO/IEC 25010 | NIST AI RMF: safe)
- Risks mitigated
- Parameter hallucinationPrompt-manipulated parameter injectionFabricated identifiers (order, user, flight numbers)Inferred rather than explicitly extracted shipping addresses
Sources
- Ch3.7: T. Nguyen, "Tool Usage Auditing," in Mastering Agentic AI Systems: Guide for the NVIDIA NCP-AAI Exam, 1st ed. 2026, ch. 3.7. ISBN: 9798244538229.
- Ch3.8: T. Nguyen, "Action Accuracy Metrics," in Mastering Agentic AI Systems: Guide for the NVIDIA NCP-AAI Exam, 1st ed. 2026, ch. 3.8. ISBN: 9798244538229.