Stage 1 checklist and failure modes

Outcome

This page is a single place to work from when running all of Stage 1, from framing the domain to closing the last gap. It does not repeat any sub-stage page’s own conditions or failures; it links to them. Its own added value is two lists this guide keeps nowhere else: every Stage 1 gate in page order, and a short set of failure patterns that show up on more than one sub-stage.

Checklist by sub-stage

Each row links to that sub-stage’s own “Definition of done” and “Common failures” sections. Work through the pages in this order; a later sub-stage assumes the ones above it are done.

Sub-stage Definition of done Common failures
S1.1 and S1.2, frame the domain and list the tasks Definition of done Common failures
S1.3, draft the blueprint Definition of done Common failures
S1.4a, search planning and execution Definition of done Common failures
S1.4b, screening and conversion Definition of done Common failures
S1.4c, injection screening Definition of done Common failures
S1.5a, concept extraction Definition of done Common failures
S1.5b, distillate and quote bank Definition of done Common failures
S1.6, knowledge items Definition of done Common failures
S1.7, concept map and prerequisite hierarchy Definition of done Common failures
S1.8, coverage and gaps Definition of done Common failures

Gates in order

A trimmed, page-ordered view of the Stage 1 index’s own Approvals table. That table stays the source of truth; read it for the human-roles gate kind and the basis label behind each row.

After What the person approves Where it is defined
S1.1 The boundary statement Approvals
S1.3 The weighted blueprint Approvals
S1.4a The search plan set, before any query runs Approvals
S1.4a, the runner What to do when the circuit breaker opens Approvals
S1.4b and S1.4c The selected sources, the flagged list and the blocked-document list Approvals
S1.5 Each batch of distillations Approvals
S1.6 A batch of sources’ draft items Approvals
S1.6 The consolidated, deduplicated item set Approvals
S1.7 The concept map and hierarchy Approvals
S1.8 The expansion plan Approvals

Failure patterns that recur

Each pattern below shows up more than once across Stage 1. The link goes to a page where a concrete instance is described in full; the pattern itself is not repeated there.

  • A check that passes on a small, synthetic sample but says nothing about a reader’s own material. A clean run of a sample script only shows that the script works on this guide’s own data; see S1.4c’s tripwire note and S1.5b’s quote-check limits for two stated instances.
  • A pause satisfied by a standing instruction to continue, which no longer shows that anyone looked. See Human roles, gates and batching for the general point, and the S1.5 batch-pause row for where this guide flags it as a real risk rather than a formality.
  • A later step using an artifact before its own approval has actually landed. S1.4a requires the search plan set approved before any query runs; S1.7 similarly holds the map and hierarchy for approval before S1.8 reads it. Skipping ahead defeats the point of the gate.
  • A cap or threshold that nothing enforces automatically, so a person has to remember to check it. S1.4a’s own recall target, S1.7’s relation-density band, and S1.8’s expansion-loop cap are each a number this guide’s own scripts do not stop the reader from exceeding; a person has to look. (The circuit breaker on S1.4a’s own runner is the opposite case: it does stop the queue by itself, and only the decision of what to do next needs a person.)

Before you start Stage 2

Confirm each of these exists and has a recorded approval before moving on:

  • A dated boundary file and a task list (S1.1 and S1.2).
  • A blueprint that passes its check, with a weight rationale for every domain (S1.3).
  • Admitted sources: converted, checked, and scanned for hidden instructions (S1.4a through S1.4c).
  • Canonical knowledge items, deduplicated across sources (S1.6).
  • A checked concept map and prerequisite hierarchy, with every concept’s tier filled in (S1.7).
  • A gap list with a decision recorded for every open row: closed, deferred, or accepted as a known gap (S1.8).

Next: Stage 2 Content development.


To the extent possible under law, copyright and related rights in this work are waived under CC0 1.0 Universal.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.